- No property record is read
- No unit count, lien or zoning check
- No workbook: the arithmetic stays in the chat
- Ask again and the wording, and often the number, changes
You already have ChatGPT. Why would you need Titleman?
A fair question. The answer is not a better model. It is the record behind every figure, the checks before you sign, and the files your desk actually hands over.
The questionWhat is the going-in cap rate on 1017 Jefferson Ave, Miami Beach?
4.29% at the $4,000,000 last recorded sale, on Year 1 NOI of $171,703.
- Units on record: 21 or 26. Two records disagree, so both are named, not averaged
- Four red flags: unit count, a lien flag, a nonconforming building, recertification
- A 12-sheet workbook with live formulas your analyst can change
Run 26021, 4 October 2026, on a real address as a benchmark. See the worked example →
What a general assistant is not
Six things a chat window does not do on its own
Owner, sales, debt, permits and zoning for the address, each with its date, from 2,100+ connected sources. Where the record is silent, the gap is named.
Every underwriting comes with a live Excel model. The language model proposes; the workbook does the arithmetic, and the same comps request returns the same set.
Deal Review read a six-file package: 1,788 figures, formulas and statements checked, 876 formulas recomputed by code, 6 red flags marked in a copy of the files.
Two records say 21 and 26 units. A chat picks one or averages. Titleman shows both, says where each came from, and raises a flag.
A BOV deck, an underwriting model, an IC memo, a marked copy of your workbook: PowerPoint, Excel and PDF, ready for the desk.
Forward a deal to [email protected] and the answer comes back in the thread. Titleman is listed in the official MCP registry, so Claude can call the engine directly.
A subscription is not a system
What your desk assembles around a chat, and what comes back with a Titleman job
| What the deal needs | A general assistant on its own | Titleman |
|---|---|---|
| The property record behind each figure | You find it and paste it in | Read for the address, each fact dated |
| A live Excel model | You build it | Comes back with every underwriting |
| Every figure checked against the record | You check it | Marked green, yellow or red, with the reason |
| The same request, the same comps | Changes from run to run | Same request, same set |
| Deck, model and memo files | You lay them out | PowerPoint, Excel and PDF |
| Delivery to your inbox or CRM | Copy and paste | Email, CRM, WhatsApp or Telegram |
| Your files | Depends on your plan settings | Isolated per firm, never used to train models |
Watch it side by side
The same job, given to Claude and to Titleman
Not either-or: Titleman is listed in the official MCP registry, so you can add it to Claude and ask the engine from the chat you already use. How to connect it →
Bring one deal you already closed
We run it on Titleman next to the answer your team, or a general assistant, gave. You compare the two.
Request a demo