A feasibility assessment for a development: what can be built, what it costs, what it returns.
Development feasibility shows up in 14.3% of working conversations, so the named-product count understates how often this is the real question.
How to run it
Give an address. Documents are optional.
What comes back
A canvas report on 91% of runs in the last thirty days — the highest rate of any product we run. No deck, no workbook.
Median 20 minutes, but the 90th percentile is 142 — the tail here is genuinely long. If you need it by a time, ask and we will quote the slow end.
Median 4.8 credits.
Do
- State the programme you have in mind. Unit mix, target size, phasing — feasibility against a specific programme is a far sharper answer than feasibility in general.
- Give your cost assumptions if you have them. Build cost is the input that moves the result most, and yours are better than ours.
- Plan for the tail on anything time-critical.
Do not
- Do not expect local planning rules to be applied. Zoning is carried for 21 cities, and the jurisdiction pack does not reach the model on any run. Density, height, parking minimums, tenure conventions: if your answer turns on one, put it in the brief.
- Do not expect a workbook. This product does not produce one. If you want the model, run Value Opinion.