Guide

Archer vs Clik.ai: Multifamily Underwriting or Document Spreading? (2026)

Archer vs Clik.ai for CRE underwriting: Archer is multifamily investment and underwriting software that starts from an address, Clik.ai spreads financial documents into Excel models and lender templates across asset types. What each does, where each stops and how each prices.

Pick Archer if you invest in or broker multifamily and want one tool that screens deals from an address, parses the rent roll and T-12, runs your own model and tracks the pipeline. Pick Clik.ai if you lend on or service several asset types and need operating statements and rent rolls turned into Excel models and lender templates at volume.

Published by Titleman, which makes one of the tools compared. Updated 19 October 2026.

Both tools parse rent rolls and T-12s. Archer wraps the parse in market analysis and a deal pipeline for multifamily buyers; Clik.ai wraps it in lending operations.

Archer vs Clik.ai at a glance

QuestionArcherClik.ai
Best forMultifamily investors, brokers, lenders and property managers, per ArcherLenders, loan operations, investors and investment sales teams, per Clik.ai
What it doesPer Archer: start "with just an address", rent roll and T-12 parsing "in under 10 seconds", your own model loaded "in about a minute", sales, financial and rent comp analysis, market strategy and a deal pipelinePer Clik.ai: AutoUW extracts operating statements and rent rolls into "Excel-compatible models", T-12 versus budget variance and lender-specific templates; services include lease abstraction, loan onboarding and portfolio dashboards
Asset typesBranded "The Complete Multifamily Investment & Underwriting Platform"; other property types not stated on its siteEight listed, including multifamily, office, retail, industrial and hotel
ExcelAn Excel integration, per Archer; how it works is not described on the pageExcel-compatible models and custom Excel models, per Clik.ai
Where it stopsFocus is multifamily; non-multifamily coverage not stated on its siteWorks from the documents you send; sourcing property records or comps is not stated on its site
Pricing modelAnnual platform fee plus a usage, per-closed-deal or unlimited option, quoted to your needs; unlimited users, per Archer; no prices shownNo pricing on its site; the call to action is to schedule a demo

What each one is built around

Archer is organized around the buyer's or broker's workflow: find a market, find a deal, underwrite it in your own model, track it. Its broker page mentions generating BOVs, and its lender page mentions spreading into templates and portfolio monitoring.

Clik.ai is organized around document operations. AutoUW accepts Excel, PDF, scanned PDF, Word and image files by upload or API, and can push data to other systems. Its wider service list reaches into servicing work such as loan disbursement processing.

Who should pick which

  • Choose Archer if you buy or broker multifamily, want screening, comps and pipeline in one place, and prefer to keep your own underwriting model.
  • Choose Clik.ai if you are a lender or loan operations team with a document queue across office, retail, industrial, hotel and housing assets, and the output must land in specific templates.
  • Mixed asset acquisitions team? Check Archer's coverage for your property types directly with Archer before you commit, since its site centers on multifamily.

More context: the best AI tools for commercial real estate, Blooma vs Clik.ai and what to check in rent roll extraction software.

Where Titleman fits

Titleman is a third option with a different starting point: an address. It gathers the property record from 2,100+ sources, selects comps, reads the OM, rent roll and T-12 when you have them, and returns an underwriting, value opinion or feasibility package. An underwriting run returns a memo and a live Excel model with about 1,000 data points; every figure is traced to its source or formula, and what could not be found is named as missing, not filled. Measured over the 30 days to 18 October 2026, the median underwriting took about 58 minutes (44 runs). The underwriting is of the property, not the borrower, and the text gives no final price or buy or sell verdict. It is not a deal pipeline and does not run servicing operations. It is most useful when a property has no package yet and the record, zoning and comps still have to be assembled. See deal analysis software or request access.

FAQ

What is the difference between Archer and Clik.ai?

Archer is multifamily investment and underwriting software that starts from an address and adds comps, market analysis and a deal pipeline. Clik.ai is document processing and operations software that spreads operating statements and rent rolls into Excel models and lender templates across many asset types.

Does Archer work for office or industrial properties?

Archer's site brands it as multifamily investment and underwriting software. Coverage of other property types is not stated on its site, so ask Archer directly.

How do Archer and Clik.ai price?

Per Archer's pricing page, an annual platform fee plus a usage, per-closed-deal or unlimited option, quoted to your needs, with unlimited users. Clik.ai shows no pricing and asks buyers to schedule a demo. Neither showed prices on 19 October 2026.

Can both tools read a rent roll and T-12?

Yes, both say so. Archer says it parses rent rolls and T-12s in under 10 seconds. Clik.ai says AutoUW extracts data from operating statements, rent rolls and other financial documents.

Where does Titleman fit next to Archer and Clik.ai?

Titleman starts from a property address, gathers records from 2,100+ sources and comps, reads any documents you have, and returns a memo and live Excel underwriting with every figure traced to its source or formula. It is not a deal pipeline or a servicing tool.

Statements about other companies come from each company's own website, read on 19 October 2026.

Sources:

See what Titleman produces on an address of yours

Request a demo