Pick Blooma if you run a commercial real estate lending team and want an insights layer that screens new deals against your credit criteria and monitors the loans you already hold. Pick Clik.ai if your bottleneck is getting T-12s, rent rolls and operating statements spread into Excel models and lender templates at volume, across many asset types.
Published by Titleman, which makes one of the tools compared. Updated 19 October 2026.
Both sell to lenders. They automate different steps of the loan process, and that is the decision.
Blooma vs Clik.ai at a glance
| Question | Blooma | Clik.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | CRE lending teams screening originations and monitoring a loan book | Lenders, investors and investment sales teams processing deal documents at volume |
| What it does | Per Blooma: Origination Intelligence for deal screening against "your institution's criteria", Portfolio Intelligence for alerts and risk monitoring, plus data and workflow connections | Per Clik.ai: AutoUW extracts data from operating statements, rent rolls and other financial documents into "Excel-compatible models", T-12 versus budget variance and lender-specific templates; InvestAssist for investment analysis with memos and presentations |
| Inputs | Borrower documents, financial data and property performance metrics, per Blooma | Excel, PDF, scanned PDF, Word and image files, by upload or API, per Clik.ai |
| Asset types | Not stated on its site | Eight listed, including multifamily, office, retail, industrial and hotel; Clik.ai calls AutoUW "asset class agnostic" |
| Where it stops | Blooma says it is not a loan origination system, a CRM or a data provider; it sits on top of your stack | Works from the documents you send; sourcing property records or comps is not stated on its site |
| Pricing model | Two plans, Blooma Pro and Blooma Enterprise, sized by team and annual origination volume; no prices shown; proof-of-concept work is "typically paid", per Blooma | No pricing on its site; the call to action is to schedule a demo |
What each one is built around
Blooma describes itself as "the insights engine that augments your current tech stack". The emphasis is on the lender's decision: does this deal fit our box, and what is happening across the loans we already made. Its plans page draws the line between Pro and Enterprise at four team members and $500M in annual originations, with Enterprise adding portfolio monitoring, customization and dedicated support.
Clik.ai describes itself as an operational backbone for commercial real estate and banking, covering underwriting, servicing and data operations. Beyond AutoUW, its site lists loan onboarding, disbursement processing, lease abstraction and audit, portfolio dashboards and custom Excel models.
Who should pick which
- Choose Blooma if your team already has a loan origination system and data feeds, and the gap is a consistent screen at intake plus alerts on the existing book.
- Choose Clik.ai if analysts spend their week keying operating statements and rent rolls into spreads, or you need agency and custom lender templates filled across mixed asset types.
For the wider field, see the best AI tools for commercial real estate, and compare Archer vs Clik.ai or Archer vs Blooma.
Where Titleman fits
Titleman is a third option with a different starting point: an address. It gathers the property record from 2,100+ sources, selects comps, reads the OM, rent roll and T-12 when you have them, and returns an underwriting, value opinion or feasibility package. An underwriting run returns a memo and a live Excel model with about 1,000 data points; every figure is traced to its source or formula, and what could not be found is named as missing, not filled. Measured over the 30 days to 18 October 2026, the median underwriting took about 58 minutes (44 runs). The underwriting is of the property, not the borrower, and the text gives no final price or buy or sell verdict. It does not monitor a loan portfolio or run servicing, so it does not replace either tool on this page. Teams use it when the deal arrives with little more than an address and the property facts still have to be found. See real estate underwriting AI or request access and run a property you know.
FAQ
What is the difference between Blooma and Clik.ai?
Blooma is an insights layer for CRE lenders: it screens new deals against the lender's criteria and monitors existing loans. Clik.ai focuses on document processing: it extracts T-12s, rent rolls and operating statements into Excel models and lender templates, and offers related services such as lease abstraction.
Does Blooma or Clik.ai show prices?
Neither site showed prices on 19 October 2026. Blooma lists two plans, Pro and Enterprise, sized by team and origination volume. Clik.ai asks buyers to schedule a demo.
Which is better for spreading rent rolls and T-12s?
Clik.ai, based on how each company describes itself. Its AutoUW product is built around extracting data from operating statements and rent rolls into Excel models. Blooma does not name rent rolls or T-12s on its Origination Intelligence page.
Does Blooma replace a loan origination system?
No. Blooma says on its site that it is not a loan origination system, a CRM or a data provider, and that it works with the systems you already use.
Where does Titleman fit next to Blooma and Clik.ai?
Titleman starts from a property address, gathers records from 2,100+ sources and comps, and returns a memo and live Excel underwriting with every figure traced to its source or formula. It underwrites the property, not the borrower, and does not do loan portfolio monitoring or servicing.
Statements about other companies come from each company's own website, read on 19 October 2026.
Sources: