Archer and Titleman both use AI to shorten underwriting, but they start from different places. Per its own site, Archer is built for multifamily and turns rent rolls and T12s into an underwriting inside your firm's Excel model. Titleman starts from an address and covers more than one property type, gathering the record and comps itself. If your firm has a standard multifamily Excel model and the bottleneck is feeding it, Archer is designed for that. If the bottleneck is the whole first read on a property, Titleman is.
Published by Titleman, which makes one of the tools compared. Updated 19 October 2026.
The comparison at a glance
| Feature | Archer | Titleman |
|---|---|---|
| Property focus | Multifamily, per its site | Multifamily and other commercial types |
| Starting point | Rent roll and T12 uploads | An address, plus OM, rent roll and T-12 if you have them |
| Model | Your own Excel model (Bring Your Own Model) or the Archer Standard Model | Titleman's Excel model with live formulas |
| Comps | Rent, expense and sales comps from parsed documents and third-party data | Comps from records for each request by a fixed rule; rows that are not comparable are labeled "reference only" |
| Speed claim | About 10 seconds per parse, about 1 minute per underwrite | Median about 58 minutes for a full underwriting (measured) |
| Customers claimed | 100+ multifamily firms | Not listed here |
| Trial | Free trial (card required); paid trial to bring your own model; see its site for terms | Not listed here |
Archer statements are from archer.re and its help center, read 19 and 20 October 2026, and are Archer's own claims. We have not verified them.
Reading the speed numbers correctly
Archer's one-minute figure describes an underwrite into a template that already holds your structure. Titleman's 58 minutes is a median from request to delivered files, measured over the 30 days to 18 October 2026, for a job that includes gathering the property record, choosing comps, reading the documents and building the model. Neither number tells you which tool is faster for your deal. Time your own.
Where Archer is the better fit
A multifamily buyer who underwrites on a standard internal model, wants that model populated consistently from messy rent rolls and T12s, and values mapping to a chart of accounts. Archer's site describes mapping, an audit trail to source cells, and corrections that improve parsing.
Where Titleman is the better fit
An investor or lender who also looks at office, retail, industrial or land, who wants the property record and comparable sales assembled with each input showing its source and date, or who wants a value opinion or feasibility package from the same starting point. Missing items are named as missing.
What to test
Use a rent roll with merged cells or a scanned page, plus a T-12 with a mislabeled line. See whether each tool flags it. Check each comp against a real closed sale. Open the output in the model your team will actually use.
What neither replaces
- A licensed appraisal where required.
- A property condition report and environmental review.
- Title and legal diligence.
- Your own view on rent growth and exit.
Titleman underwrites the property, not the borrower, and its memo states no final price or buy or sell verdict. Repeat runs can differ, so review the listed assumptions. See also Titleman vs Enodo and failure modes of multifamily underwriting software.
To run a deal, request access.
Written by the Titleman team with AI assistance (Claude). Statements about other companies come from each company's own website or documentation, read on 19 October 2026, and are marked as theirs. Titleman competes with some of the products discussed here.