Titleman Feasibility studies a development site from an address: what the parcel allows, the approval path, what to build and what the land is worth. Across completed production runs in the 30 days to 18 October 2026, the median time from the request to the delivered files was about 28 minutes.
Published by Titleman, which makes the product described. Updated 22 October 2026.
Specification at a glance
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Job | Zoning envelope, buildable area, cost and revenue assumptions and a residual land value |
| Input | A street address; optional documents |
| Site size | Up to eight parcels joined into one site |
| Documents read | Text PDFs, up to 25 MB each, eight files |
| Outputs | Verdict, study in six sections, Excel workbook with live formulas |
| Median time | About 28 minutes (30 days to 18 October 2026) |
| Slowest tenth | Longer than about 72 minutes |
| Accuracy | No error rate measured on real client deals |
Inputs
| Input | Notes |
|---|---|
| Street address, city | Enough to start. The parcel is found and drawn on the map with its zoning and size |
| Neighboring lots | Add up to eight parcels to one site |
| Survey, title commitment, appraisal | Optional. Figures read from them replace the records' |
| Program | Unit mix, target size and phasing, if you have them |
| Cost assumptions | Build cost moves the result most; yours replace ours |
Text PDFs are read. Scans, Word, Excel and image files are attached by name and are not read.
Outputs
- The verdict: what to build and what to bid.
- The study, in sections: Answer, Approval path, What to build, What you can pay, The site, Proof and gaps.
- The workbook, XLSX with live formulas: summary, assumptions, development budget, sources and uses, land residual and returns, sensitivity when the run builds one, and the sources.
Measured time
The clock is the time from the request to the delivered files, over completed production runs created in the 30 days to 18 October 2026, the same clock for every product. For feasibility it gave a median of about 28 minutes, and one run in ten took longer than about 72. The spread is wide: plan for the slow end on anything time-critical.
Limits
- Local planning rules. Density, height, parking minimums and tenure conventions are not applied automatically. If your answer turns on one, state it in the brief.
- Files. Only text PDFs are read, and only within the size and count above.
- Parcels. A site holds up to eight parcels.
- Gaps are named. What the run could not establish is listed under Proof and gaps, not filled in.
What it does not replace
Feasibility does not replace the planning authority's zoning confirmation, an entitlement attorney, an architect or an engineer, or a licensed appraisal. It tells you what the site appears to allow and what the land might be worth under stated assumptions, so you know what to take to those professionals.
How these figures were measured
Source: run records of the Titleman AI engine, completed production runs created in the 30 days to 18 October 2026, timed from the request to the delivered files. The median is rounded up to the whole minute. Accuracy has not been measured against real client deals, and no accuracy figure is claimed.
Frequently asked questions
How long does it take? A median of about 28 minutes, and one run in ten longer than about 72, in the 30 days to 18 October 2026.
What do I need? A street address. Documents are optional.
How many parcels and files? Up to eight parcels; text PDFs up to 25 MB, eight files.
What comes back? A verdict, the study in sections and a workbook with live formulas.
Does it replace an entitlement review? No.
To run a study on your own site, request a demo. A longer description is in land feasibility software.